<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sen. Peralta Discusses Microstamping Push</title>
	<atom:link href="http://capitaltonightny.ynn.com/2012/07/sen-peralta-discusses-microstamping-push/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://capitaltonightny.ynn.com/2012/07/sen-peralta-discusses-microstamping-push/</link>
	<description>NY&#039;s only statewide political program</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 22:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brianshapiro10</title>
		<link>http://capitaltonightny.ynn.com/2012/07/sen-peralta-discusses-microstamping-push/comment-page-1/#comment-37735</link>
		<dc:creator>Brianshapiro10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capitaltonightny.ynn.com/?p=77262#comment-37735</guid>
		<description>Senator Gianaris talks of using California Law for a model. I lived in California for 18 years before coming back and complied with their gun laws. A few (very few) aspects of it are sensible, to be true. However, California requires NO license for hangun possession in one&#039;s home or business nor is one required to transport handguns (for lawful purposes) in a locked container. California also has State Pre-emption law.  NYS should first repeal the Sullivan Act, together with PL Sections 265 and 400 and pass State Pre-emption (translation:  NYC Gun Law is overridden) before overhauling Gun Control to emulate California and score more points with the Brady Campaign.  CA gun laws may be easily verified on the CA Attorney General website (Firearms Division).  This is a very well constructed site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senator Gianaris talks of using California Law for a model. I lived in California for 18 years before coming back and complied with their gun laws. A few (very few) aspects of it are sensible, to be true. However, California requires NO license for hangun possession in one&#8217;s home or business nor is one required to transport handguns (for lawful purposes) in a locked container. California also has State Pre-emption law.  NYS should first repeal the Sullivan Act, together with PL Sections 265 and 400 and pass State Pre-emption (translation:  NYC Gun Law is overridden) before overhauling Gun Control to emulate California and score more points with the Brady Campaign.  CA gun laws may be easily verified on the CA Attorney General website (Firearms Division).  This is a very well constructed site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJCEditor</title>
		<link>http://capitaltonightny.ynn.com/2012/07/sen-peralta-discusses-microstamping-push/comment-page-1/#comment-37325</link>
		<dc:creator>AJCEditor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 17:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capitaltonightny.ynn.com/?p=77262#comment-37325</guid>
		<description>Jacob...Nicely said.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacob&#8230;Nicely said.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Rieper</title>
		<link>http://capitaltonightny.ynn.com/2012/07/sen-peralta-discusses-microstamping-push/comment-page-1/#comment-37305</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Rieper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 12:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capitaltonightny.ynn.com/?p=77262#comment-37305</guid>
		<description>This bill has been losing support every year as evidenced by the increasing number of no votes and decreasing number of yes votes in the Assembly.  It has no public support and the sponsors are getting desperate. Peralta has no clue what he&#039;s talking about and he&#039;s (literally) just recycling the same talking points that Michelle Schimel spouts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This bill has been losing support every year as evidenced by the increasing number of no votes and decreasing number of yes votes in the Assembly.  It has no public support and the sponsors are getting desperate. Peralta has no clue what he&#8217;s talking about and he&#8217;s (literally) just recycling the same talking points that Michelle Schimel spouts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
